- **High-value signal, but not a buying signal yet.** Completing the post-video survey shows active engagement and intent to learn—strong behavioral data, but it's a content-consumption action, not a purchase-readiness action. - 完成视频后问卷说明客户愿意投入时间、有学习意图，是高质量互动信号；但它属于内容消费行为，并非明确的购买信号。 - **Score rises 45 → 50, still below the 60 threshold—so C Pool holds.** The AI weights survey completion as a meaningful but mid-tier increment (~+5); the cumulative score doesn't yet justify a pool upgrade. - 分数从45升到50，仍低于60的升级门槛，因此留在C池；问卷行为被AI视为中等权重的加分项（约+5），累计分数还不足以触发升级。 - **Trigger low-friction nurturing, not a proposal.** At C Pool: send targeted content (e.g., case studies on enterprise training ROI), schedule a light-touch check-in task, and tag the survey responses to tailor messaging. Hold the B2B proposal until B Pool. - C池阶段应触发低成本培育动作：推送针对性内容（如企业培训ROI案例）、安排轻量跟进任务、用问卷答案做个性化标签；B2B提案应留到B池再发。 - **Deal potential: 100-unit distribution inquiry is real but unqualified.** The survey engagement suggests genuine interest; without an upgrade, sales follow-up should focus on qualifying scope, budget, and decision timeline before investing sales effort. - 100台分销询盘有真实潜力，但尚未资格化；在未升级前，销售跟进应聚焦确认采购范围、预算和决策时间表，再投入销售资源。 - **Business logic: protect sales efficiency.** Keeping the lead in C Pool with automated nurturing preserves sales bandwidth; the score trajectory (15 → 45 → 50) shows steady momentum—continued engagement should push it past 60 and trigger the C→B upgrade and proposal task. - 保留在C池并用自动化培育可保护销售效率；分数轨迹（15→45→50）显示稳步上升，持续互动应能突破60，触发C→B升级和提案任务。